Hi there,

If you think Democracy Now!’s reporting is a critical line of defense against war, climate catastrophe and authoritarianism, please make your donation of $10 or more right now. Today, a generous donor will DOUBLE your donation, which means it’ll go 2x as far to support our independent journalism. Democracy Now! is funded by you, and that’s why we’re counting on your donation to keep us going strong. Please give today. Every dollar makes a difference—in fact, gets doubled! Thank you so much.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

Supreme Court Will Decide Whether U.S. Officials Can Be Sued for Lying to Jennifer Harburyabout What Happened to Her Husband, Who Was Captured, Tortured, and Executed By Guatemalan Officialson the Pay

Listen
Media Options
Listen

Related

The Supreme Court agreed this week to decide whether former Clinton Administration officials such as Secretary ofState Warren Christopher or former National Security Advisor Anthony Lake could be sued by human rights lawyerJennifer Harbury for deliberately misleading her about the fate of her Guatemalan husband.

Jennifer Harbury was married to Efrain Bamaca Velasquez, a Mayan guerrilla commander known as Commandante Everardo,who was fighting the brutal Guatemalan military.

Everardo was captured in 1993, tortured for more than a year and executed, under the watch of a Guatemalan militaryofficer who was on the payroll of the CIA. After Everardo disappeared Jennifer Harbury fasted–first for more thanfour weeks in Guatemala’s Presidential Palace and then for three weeks in front of the White House, seekinginformation about what had happened to her husband.

Harbury later filed several lawsuits against U.S. government agencies and individual officials, charging that theyrepeatedly lied to her about what they knew of her husband’s death. As a result of her case the CIA was forced toimplement guidelines which supposedly restrict its ability to put human rights abusers on its payroll as intelligenceassets or covert operatives.

Then came the Sept. 11 attacks. Suddenly intelligence reforms brought about by Jennifer Harbury’s case were beingblamed for handicapping the efforts of US officials to fight terrorism. Now lawyers representing the former ClintonAdministration officials named in the suit are saying “what’s at stake here is covert operations, and that has directramifications for Afghanistan.”

Guest:

  • Jennifer Harbury, lawyer and human rights activist.

Related Story

StoryMay 08, 2024Mistrial: Abu Ghraib Survivors Detail Torture in Case Against U.S. Military Contractor
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top