Hi there,

If you think Democracy Now!’s reporting is a critical line of defense against war, climate catastrophe and authoritarianism, please make your donation of $10 or more right now. Today, a generous donor will DOUBLE your donation, which means it’ll go 2x as far to support our independent journalism. Democracy Now! is funded by you, and that’s why we’re counting on your donation to keep us going strong. Please give today. Every dollar makes a difference—in fact, gets doubled! Thank you so much.
-Amy Goodman

Non-commercial news needs your support.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Donate

UN Prepares to Ok Iraq Weapons Inspections: A Conversation with Dennis Halliday, Ex-Director of UN Humanitarian Program for Iraq

Listen
Media Options
Listen

Related

The United Nations Security Council is set to vote today on a new resolution on Iraq. After months of opposition France has said it will vote for the resolution. How Russia will vote is less certain, but U.S. officials do not expect Moscow to use its veto power.

The resolution gives weapons inspectors QUOTE “immediate, unimpeded and unconditional” rights to search anywhere in the country for weapons of mass destruction, including President Saddam Hussein’s presidential compounds. It also allows inspectors the right to take interviewees outside Iraq for questioning.

The London Guardian is reporting negotiations continued up to the wire in New York last night over French and Russian fears that the text might contain a “hidden trigger” which would allow Bush to claim UN backing for a war on Iraq without the UN security council meeting again.

Now the text makes clear that if chief UN weapons inspector Hans Blix encounters any obstruction from Iraq, the Security Council will be reconvened to assess the situation.

But the text also states that any Iraqi obstruction will automatically constitute a QUOTE “material breach.” According to the London Guardian, this theoretically allows Washington to use any obstruction as a trigger for war regardless of how they are interpreted by the council. And nothing in the resolution specifically requires Washington to wait for the Security Council to pass a resolution before it can go to war.

Guest:

  • Dennis Halliday, ex-Director of UN Humanitarian Program for Iraq

Related Story

StorySep 13, 2016Rep. Barbara Lee: Repeal 9/11 Authorization for Use of Force to Cancel Blank Check for Endless War
The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

Non-commercial news needs your support

We rely on contributions from our viewers and listeners to do our work.
Please do your part today.
Make a donation
Top